Monday, June 29, 2009

1.2 Colouring of thoughts

During my flight journey to Mumbai from Bahrain a couple of days back, I remembered the fate of Air France passengers when our flight experienced turbulence a couple of times. At that moment, it seemed immaterial who would cry holding my memories intact or conduct memorial highlighting my superficial goodness or pray for my soul to rest in peace. Where there is no life, there possibly can not be any relationship with the dead. A few thousand miles above the earth, the emotions of humans seemed over reaction of a jobless mind and a theatre classic. I felt that I would be no way affected by these emotions once I am dead.

But once landed, down the earth, separation or death appeared once again to be cruel and painful. Why and for whom?

Any relationship must be treated like a beautiful scented flower. When such a flowery relationship breaks up its destined fringes, mind goes berserk due to its emotional tie-up with pristine thoughts. The thought of separation from the beloved brings intense pain in the heart of the lover, for the beloved can never be seen, heard or touched at any point of time.

No laughter be heard, no teasing done, no arguments entertained, no warmth of affection felt, no tears of love seen – all…. all seems permanently lost in the black hole of Creation. With the name and form wiped out under the aegis of time, the dead or separated exists only in the memory of the living. The loss is acutely felt whenever this memory is tapped accidentally or deliberately.

In one sentence, pain is only for the living and not for the dead.

To experience such unbearable pain or anguish, this can’t be a time pass relationship. Like us, Uddhava too feared to experience this irreparable loss and irreconcilable pain, as his relationship with Krishna was built only on love.

To such a dear one, Shri Krishna tries to drill some wisdom into him thus, “Know this world, grasped by the mind, speech, eyes, ears and other senses, to be insubstantial and transitory, being like mental projection in a magic show. For the man of uncontrolled mind, there is erroneous perception of multiplicity; a person with such perception is subject to the notion of good and evil. Therefore, with the mind and the senses controlled, you must see the world in the Atman, and that all pervading Atman in Me, the Supreme Lord. ”

Living on this earth, is it possible to transcend this perception of multiplicity?

Though the world had not failed to entertain me with different emoticons throughout my lonely travel, I managed to remain a peaceful onlooker throughout. However, had there been any of my dear ones in danger as a part of the same entertainment, my immediate response would be to outwardly act to protect them from the evil and inwardly bend, kneel, shed tears and pray to God soulfully for their good.

That’s why Uddhava must have pleaded, “The ignorant fool I am, Maya has bound me with the feeling that I am the body, and all those connected with it are mine. O Worshipful Lord! Instruct me, how I could soon achieve that abandonment of all attachments commanded by You.”

I stand alongside his emotional pleading, for I have understood theoretically that the turbulence of the mind is only due to the non-stop colouring of thoughts and that this colouring is nothing but ‘attachment’.


P.S. The extracts are taken from the translation works of Srimad Bhagavata of Swami Tapasyananda, Ramakrisha Math.

12 comments:

  1. Wonderful...In fact this Uddhava Gita starts from the householder and ordinary person's point. As you have beautifully started we, the ordinary people, are bound by the emotions on separation of either persons or objects. So, Krishna had started with the bombshell that when you feel that you are the one and only exists in the form of Atman and the rest of the world is your magical imagination or colourful thoughts, then you are not going to be separated from anything.

    Let us wait for Krishna to teach Uddava and us how to remove this attachment and the colourful thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Dear Padmaja,
    Beautiful!
    There is always something to be attached with.
    When a person is ignorant he is attached to the people and place around him. when he realises there is god then he is attached to the god and when he realises that he is the part of god then he gets united, which is also an attachment.
    FEAR is the main factor for attachment in us. I think when fear goes away and wisdom comes in then I will have a less attachment.
    Atleast let me pray for that clarity of thoughts.

    ReplyDelete
  3. @Solai - I too am eagerly waiting. ;)

    Gowri - You have spoken profound wisdom in a few sentences. Retain this clarity always.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dear Padmaja

    "No laughter be heard, no teasing done, no arguments entertained, no warmth of affection felt, no tears of love seen – all…. all seems permanently lost in the black hole of Creation. With the name and form wiped out under the aegis of time, the dead or separated exists only in the memory of the living. The loss is acutely felt whenever this memory is tapped accidentally or deliberately." - How true are these words Padmaja! These lines speak deep philosophy. As you said, there is no pain in death. Only people who exist have this undying pain.

    I truly agree with Gowri. Fear is the underlying element that covers our potential wisdom. Attachment is also temporary, is it not?

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Latha - In other way, attachment is permanent so long we think it is permanent.

    Forceful separation is very painful, Latha. We feel so helpless and dejected. That's when we realise that there is nothing within our reach and how powerless we are. One needs extraordinary willpower to come out of such a situation and divert/channelise his/her energy towards the divine. I too like that sentence very much.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Dear Latha & Padmaja, I think you both are talking very vital point, which is crux of Vedanta. Yes, pain is not for the dead ones. But, while we sleep also we don't feel such pains. If someone is coming and telling us that someone is died during our sleep we will not cry immediately. So, the pain is only in the wakeful state. So, in the wakeful state there is pain, in the deep sleep state there is no pain. So, these sages tried to combine these two states. In the deep sleep state, which is similar to death, all the Anthakarana or the internal sensory and perceiving organs are closed. So, if we can shun all these Anthakarana, in the waking state, then we will not experience any pain. This is the Turiya state. So, going back to what you both talk, "pain is only for the living and not for the dead", if we are dead while alive, we will not have any pain :).

    Thanks
    Solaikannan

    ReplyDelete
  7. Dear padmaja,
    Beautiful thoughts ad of course colourful!
    "In one sentence, pain is only for the living and not for the dead"
    Vowwww!
    "O Worshipful Lord! Instruct me, how I could soon achieve that abandonment of all attachments commanded by You.”
    Not only udavva but iam also waiting for the answer.
    Before getting the answer to overcome the attachment i have few questions.
    1.why these attachments were created by God?
    2.Is the desire and attachment are the same?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Wonderful post dealing with attachment, pain and death. Uddhava has asked a very valid question to transcend attachment and merge with the supreme soul.
    In response to Prakashika's queries, I have few inputs. Firstly, in this God created grand drama, we mortals are needed to play our designated role and then go back to Him, without having any desires and attachment. But we get entangled ourselves with our free will given by God, to our fellow beings and things thinking that this world is real. So the attachment is created by us and not by God. Paramahansa Yogananda has said that God waits for us to see whether we go back to Him, wanting Him alone and nothing else, through our free will. We should go for the Bestower of the Gifts than being tempted by the gifts.
    For the second query, desire and attachment are same because they are hindrances to attain the Goal, I think that the term desire is concerned mainly with the five senses, like.. desire to eat, desire to see, desire to hear, whereas attachment is for the mind. I may be wrong also.. let our friend Padmaja clarify this.
    Love,
    Preethi Anand

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks Prakashika for making this blog more lively and as a discussion board. Scriptures says, one who ask questions is the disciple. It seems to get into this disciple stage, I need to think more.

    Preethi Anand, I think none of us can be right, if what we say is right we wouldn't be discussing here. Whether it is right or wrong, we all share our understanding, isn't it?

    I think Padmaja will be busy in enjoying the rain in Mumbai. So, let me also share my input along with Preethi.

    1. I think the foundation of attachment could be the "Survival Instinct". The first attachment anybody get is towards our body and life. Later we start to acquire things to sustain the life and body. To increase the chances of survival than the fellow beings, they wanted to have better things and persons than their fellow beings. So, they would have started to protect or safeguard from others. This way the attachment could have been extended and become stronger.

    2. I feel the Attachment is father and desire is child. When we form an attachment towards a person or thing, the desire increases to acquire them. Attachment is through out, whereas desire is until we acquire. When a person talks about a new mobile phone, which has not yet been released, I started to form an attachment towards it even before acquiring it and I wanted to have it at once. This attachment continues even after I possess.

    ReplyDelete
  10. @Solai - Well said... Tranquilisers are worked out only on the theory mentioned by you. A terminally ill patient can say how grateful he is to these tranquilisers. :)

    Your explanation to Prakashika's queries are interesting, informative and logically perfect. I do agree with it. Thank you.

    @Preethi Anand - You have aptly worded what I wanted to convey in reply to Prakashika's queries. Thank you very much, Preethi.

    ReplyDelete
  11. @Prakashika - Both Preethi and Solai have very beautifully clarified your doubts. Let me add a few words to them...

    Even for a computer game, we have a lot of rules to abide. Our life is also a game, the challenge of which is accepted by us voluntarily in the beginning. Hence along with the objects and co-players, we have got our inborn temperaments which sway us all the time either towards objects or co-players, totally forgetting the goal. Now, to your questions...

    1) The attachments are not a part of the package deal but the instruments like senses and mind provided by god in the game play are clever enough to bring these attachments.

    2) Lord Krishna in Bhagavad Gita chronologically lists out thus, “When a man dwells in his mind on the object of sense, attachment to them is produced. From attachment springs desire and from desire comes anger.”

    Please revert for any further clarification.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Dear Preethi,Solai and Padmaja,
    Thank you very much for helping me in my doubts in simple language.

    ReplyDelete